Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://aura-4ecab767.mintlify.app/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

Aura relies on community-driven governance to ensure high-quality and relevant prediction markets. Every new market proposal goes through a transparent review and approval process, guided by votes from $AURA stakers.

​
How proposals are reviewed and approved

1

Proposal submission

A creator submits a proposal with a clear question, resolution rules, end time, and category. The required ALPH deposit is locked.
2

Voting period

Proposals enter a 24-hour community voting window. Eligible voters rank each proposal, weighted by their staking tier.
3

Curation

After the window closes, the most-supported proposals are reviewed against current platform capacity — number of active markets, recent daily trading volume, and the size of the proposal queue. Proposals that fit the slate are approved and deploy on-chain immediately; others are rejected and the deposit is refunded.
This balance between community signal and operational curation keeps the market list curated to platform demand while still ensuring the community decides what’s interesting in the first place.

​
Voting weight by tier

Your influence on proposal approvals scales with your staked $AURA tier.
TierVoting weightStake requirement
Degenerate301,000,000 $AURA
Diamond22833,333 $AURA
Platinum16666,667 $AURA
Gold11500,000 $AURA
Silver7333,333 $AURA
Bronze3166,667 $AURA
Iron160,000 $AURA
None0<60,000 $AURA
  • Higher tiers grant significantly more voting power, rewarding stakers who put real skin in the game.
  • Stakers below the Iron threshold can’t vote on proposals.